Wednesday, 5 April 2017

Being John Malkovich (Bianca, Darcy, Stephania, Victoria)



Being John Malkovich (1999)

 





                                        

                                                           Directed by: Spike Jonze

                                                          Written by: Charlie Kaufman

                                                          Starring: John Cusack, Cameron Diaz, Catherine Keener
                                                        
                                                          Running time: 112 minutes

                                  Link to Trailer:  http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi3568894233
  

Review
   
     Craig Shwartz is an unemployed puppeteer who lives with his wife Lotte. He soon finds a job filing paperwork at LesterCorp and quickly develops feelings for his coworker Maxine. One day, Craig discovers a small door behind a filing cabinet and decides to enter it only to discover that it is a portal that takes him into the mind of actor John Malkovich for 15 minutes until he is ejected into a ditch. When Lotte tries it for the first time, she finds herself obsessed with it and realizes she has transgender desires and has fallen in love with Maxine while in the mind of John Malkovich. Craig becomes crazy after discovering this and ties Lotte up in their chimp Elijah's cage and dates Maxine thru John where they eventually get married and have a child. Craig stays in John's body for several months and becomes a world famous puppeteer. After seeing this, Dr. Lester, Craig's boss teams up with Lotte to get Craig out by threatening to kill Maxine. Lotte at first tries to shoot Maxine and they end up in John's subconscious. When they get out, Maxine admits that it was Lotte in John's mind when she got pregnant. When he finds this out, Craig enters the portal again but finds himself trapped in the mind of Maxine's daughter, Emily.
   
    The cinematic techniques in the film are what make it so mind blowing. Firstly, the sets and props are very significant in the movie. For example, the filing cabinet was somewhat important because if Craig wouldn't have moved it, he would have never discovered  the portal.  The portal was found in his office at LesterCorp where he works which is on the 7th and a half floor. This immediately gave viewers the realization that the film was somewhat fictional and also beginning to be crazy. However, most importantly were Craig's puppets. They were essential because they basically portrayed his thoughts and experiences. They symbolized a life Craig wishes he had. This is shown when he is interested in Maxine but was getting rejected by her. Instead of going home and joining Lotte in bed, he had gone to his workshop and made a puppet of Maxine. He then made skits demonstrating the way he wishes she would be towards him; interested and affectionate.
    
    A very interesting technique was the flashback of Elijah the chimp that he had of his childhood trauma where he had to untie his brother and father. This helped him to untie Lotte when Craig had trapped her in his cage. Throughout the whole movie, Lotte talks about Elijah having childhood trauma which Craig would always dismiss since he did not believe so. Craig does not see animals as having a conscious mind and having this flashback really challenges the idea of consciousness and how non-human animals are in fact conscious. The scene was considered funny because of the ridiculous dialogue that was taking place. But, Elijah's memories were causing him trouble as an adult, and that to get better, he will have to "work through" it, like Lotte says.
 
    As for costumes, they were similar to the characters' personalities. Maxine always dressed in either a black skirt and white blouse or a plain black dress with heels which showed how confident and seductive she was. Craig had stringy hair, small circle glasses and careless wardrobe choices that did not match. They looked wrinkled and old which essentially mirrored his more cartoon-ish style. Lotte was somewhat the same with her outrageous clothes that were mostly baggy with an odd mismatch of colors and out of this world frizzy hair. She fit the profile for crazy animal lover.
     
   The overall tone of the lighting was somber, dull and gloomy in almost every scene which further illustrates how it was more of a dark movie. It started off from the beginning in the first scene with the puppet show. It consisted of fairly blue tones which carried out throughout the movie specifically Craig and Lotte's apartment which could symbolize their rather unhappy vibe that develops.
 
     Maxine was the most iconic character in the film. Right from the start she came off as rebellious, seductive, very confident and intelligent which is exactly how she ended up being. She knew what she was doing when she played both Craig and Lotte and made them both fall in love with her. Sprung from her manipulations,  we might be persuaded to say that Maxine is the true puppet master in the movie. On the subject of puppets, no one would doubt that Craig is a fantastic puppeteer which is why he thrives, more than anyone else inside of Malkovich's body. He is able to propel him into legendary and famous status within a span of a few months. Craig has fantastic relationships with things around him that he can control but his downside is that he can only control inanimate objects. His inability to control humans or his emotions eventually leads to his downfall. John Malkovich, the character who the main plot revolves around, plays himself in this film where nearly everyone takes a turn inside of his body which raises some ethical issues of consent. He has no control over his own body when someone is in his portal, specifically Craig. When he realizes this he starts to go crazy and he even enters his own portal where he freaks out because everything he sees is himself and everything he hears is his name being said. Craig is able to transform him into a famous puppeteer for a while but towards the end he also suffers a downfall when he essentially is stripped of his real identity.
.
    The film raises the philosophical issue of personal identity. It raises questions about the nature of celebrity, and why we are fascinated by them. It raises issues of self-identity and role-playing. Is it a coincidence we are sent into the brain of an actor? It also raises issues of homosexuality and sexuality in general.
 
Word Count: 1002 words
 
 
   "Being John Malkovich" meets most of the basic requirements that make a film watchable. It has a gripping plot, which provides philosophical debate, intellectual material and humor in addition to being wound up in a terrible, destructive, and kind of funny love story. In that way, we can say that the movie reaches out to a few different demographics such as the intellectual crowd but also the more laid back viewers, such as most college students. 
 In addition, the use of absurdism is used as a medium to demonstrate greater philosophical debate revolving around epistemological problems and issues of the nature of consciousness. It was something that gave the film even more humor for understanding the difficult concepts thrown at the viewers. However, we also found that the use of absurdism obscured the point of the film and made it harder to suspend our disbelief of the movie.  We would argue that because the theme of the Absurd is not completely revealed to us at the introduction of the movie, it leaves less of a foothold for newcomers to enter the philosophical discussion and grab hold of the greater ideas this movie talks about. The only thing we see before Craig walks into the obviously absurd Lester Corp. building, is his family life. The viewer knows that the film is not realistic only once Craig goes into Lester Corp., but as strange as his home life is, taking care of a sick monkey with his frizzy girlfriend is something people would accept and not see as a reason to watch the movie with a critical eye. Overall, we believe that with the combination of its dense intellectual implications, its commentary on the relationships between people, its sense of humor, and good cinematography, it overcomes a weakness which could only be called a "complicated movie".
   1) Consciousness is a key term present in both the film and course material.  At the very beginning of the movie, Craig says “you don’t know how lucky you are being a monkey because consciousness is a terrible curse. I think, I feel, I suffer.” A subject that has been brought up often in class is whether animals are conscious and if they feel pain or not. We saw a video which demonstrated how monkeys feel empathy and how other animals are self-aware, etc. In the film, Lotte brings up how the monkey has childhood trauma and there is a scene which shows the monkey remembering the trauma he went through when he was younger. That is an example of the idea that he is conscious and he does feel pain and is self-aware even though Craig is being ignorant in a way, and does not believe animals are conscious while Lotte does.
    2) Another connection is the idea of metaphysics. In the movie, after Craig went into the portal for the first time, he said to Maxine “this raises all sorts of philosophical-type questions about the nature of self, about the existence of soul.”  He then said that he had a piece of wood in his hand when he went in and when he came out it was gone. “Where is it? Did it disappear? How could that be? Is it still in Malkovich’s head?...Do you see what a metaphysical can of worm this portal is?” In class, we learned that metaphysics “encompasses everything that exists, as well as the nature of existence itself.”
   3) The idea of personhood is present in “Being John Malkovich” which we have also seen in class. Personhood is defined as the status of being a person. People that are not considered to have personhood are usually slaves, fetuses and ancestors. In this case, John would technically not be granted personhood because he is considered Craig's slave because he is the one in control of his body. A slave is someone who cannot control his or her actions, have any rights or how they should live their life. This is exactly what its like to be John because he no longer has a say in anything. Craig controls John and he starts to take over his sense of self by controlling him through changing his career from acting to being a puppeteer, as well as controlling his whole relationship with Maxine.


Questions

1. If you could, would you want to experience someone else's inner life? If so, who?

2. If you were going to die, would you trap yourself inside an infants mind to continue some form of life?

3.What is the meaning behind the 7 and a half floor?

Web links
 
This reddit thread explores the theme of dehumanization shown throughout the film. Principally,  that Malkovich serves as a vessel for many people. It also discusses the relationships that develop in the film which are defined by love as obsession, particularly between Craig and Lotte with Maxine.



This film review informed by Christian Faith highlights the controversy of sex and gender politics as some of many themes that have come up. It also touches upon identity, manipulation, immortality, voyeurism, commercialism, the subconscious, and the celebrity-fan relationship.
 



Work Cited


 "Being John Malkovich - Review." Imdb, 1 April.    2017, www.imdb.com/reviews/230/23063.html.

Faith, Christian. "Being John Malkovich Review." decentfilms,     
              http://decentfilms.com/reviews/beingjohnmalkovich. Accessed 4 April 2017.

 
LeManLeLegend. "Re: Being John Malkovich Discussion and Analysis of Themes." /r/truefilm,
            4 April. 2017,https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueFilm/comments/4rhqa5/
            being_john_malkovich_1999_discussion_and_analysis/










7 comments:

  1. Question 2: If i was going to die i would not trap myself inside the mind of an infant in order to live on in some form. Is life really worth living anymore if you can only think about the fact that you are in another persons head and unable to express yourself physically? To be trapped inside a body that is not even yours just to feel alive when in fact it may not even be considered living but rather observing another persons life. If you are trapped inside an infant's head then would the child still be fully conscious of who they are and unaware that you are inside their head at any point in time observing their life,or would you become the bodies new mind and essentially take over the infants thoughts and ideas completely and everything but the body is you?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Q2: In this case, I would not want to be trapped inside an infants’ mind. I think it has something to do with my very biased thought that I find it very cowardly to I guess “beg” for more time after your time is up. Anyways, I think that it’s something I wouldn’t choose to do because I find that it would be a burden for the infant in order for you to “live”. If I trapped myself in an infants’ mind, I would sort of be like the unwanted voices or alien thoughts of a schizophrenic person. Also, if I was trapped in its mind, I wouldn’t have any control on how to live my new prolonged life, therefore I’d just be a spectator. Also, considering I’d be basically watching the life of a new person unravel, it would be like someone getting mad at their TV when something in the show they’re watching doesn’t go their way. It’s kind of like the same thing, since we have all our previous experiences we will be irritated when the person who we’re living in screws up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Question #1: No, I would not want to experience someone else's inner life. I believe that every person is built in such a way to have their own personal experiences, and for me to experience that person's inner life, I will have to become that person(with their biological make up). I don't believe that, I can still/fully be me/myself and experience someone else's inner life. However, if my belief is wrong i still would not want to experience someone else's inner life, because we all have our personal issues that we battle with on a daily basic, so there is no need to experience the same things that we as humans face, my struggles may not be your struggle, and your happiness may not be my happiness, and vice versa. The only way I would want to experience someone else's inner life, is if that person's life is a life full of ONLY peace and tranquility, there's no pain, no sorrow, no struggles, no conflict, etc. And we know that there is no such person/ life without such experiences.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Question 1) If I was given the chance to experience someone else’s inner life I would take the opportunity just to be able to see what it would be like to be in somebody else’s shoes after being in my own for my entire life, to see through someone else’s eyes instead of my own for once. I think that being somebody else’s inner life would be very eye opening experience, an experience that I would be able to learn a lot from and it would possibly change my perspective of how I view other people once I’m back as myself again. Being in somebody else’s inner life for the first time would maybe make me think about what it would be like to be that person when interacting with them afterwards. It would maybe change entirely the way I treat others. At the same time I don’t think that I do need to go through this experience to have this frame of mind when deciding how to treat people, it is something that I should be doing already. I also think it would be interesting to be able to observe the only person that I would never be able to observe from the exterior when in my own body, myself. It would be fascinating to see how other people view me. I know this wasn’t able to happen in the film Being John Malkovich because one would be inside a tunnel while inside the mind of the celebrity but if this was an option it would be one of the reasons as to why I would choose to experience someone else’s inner life.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Question 1: I would definitely want to experience someone else’s inner life. The closest we can get to fully understanding the inner selves of others is through communication but articulation and sharing can only go so far as compared to actually feeling something exactly how someone else does. If I could pick anyone, it’d be Hitler because even though he’s a bad person, he’s one of the most interesting minds to study. Even just the concept that he’s Jewish and still has such a drive to destroy Jewish people is something we can only study and question through old speeches and his actions through history, but I want to know what such complex thought feels like. Even with talking and thinking about the holocaust and Hitler so often, there is still an obsession with them and so many unanswered questions.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Question 2: If I was going to die, I would not want to be stuck inside an infant's mind to continue my life. In my opinion, my life and my mind is all connected to my physical body. I am not myself if I cannot express myself. It doesn't matter if I express myself through the clothing I wear, the things I say or the things I do, as long as I could express myself I am happy. But if I was in the skin of a child none of that would be possible. Being in a baby the most I would be able to do, if my mind gained control of the baby, would be crying on command or pooping my pants, really not much. It would be a living hell for someone like me who has the need for expression. Also, i believe that if you are in someone else’s body it just isn’t “you”. If you can’t identify with the body then it just isn’t the right body for you. This could be similar for people who suffer from BIID. There is a limb on their body, it is perfectly functioning, but to them it doesn’t belong. Since they don’t think that the limb is theirs then it isn’t. So they would remove the limb to feel complete and have their own self. On the other hand, and in an optimistic point of view it would be interesting to spectate a baby’s mind from the inside. There are so many question that could be answered by spectating a baby’s mind. Overall, I wouldn’t want to be stuck in a baby’s mind. But the lack of responsibilities and nap time is very tempting.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jasmeet answered question number 2: Life and death is a concept we are all familiar with to a certain extent. Everyone has the right to live their life and be able to have experiences of their own. There is a belief that the day we are going to die was already written the day we came onto this earth. I would not want to trap myself inside an infant’s mind just to continue some form of life. If my time was meant to end then there’s a reason behind that. Yes, I would want to be able to live my life but I would want to live it in my own body and know that I am really alive. Even though it would be an infant’s mind and that infant or anyone wouldn’t exactly know that I am in their mind, I just don’t find it right. Also,I would not want to live my life feeling guilty in the sense that I will be invading someone’s thoughts. It would make me very annoyed that I am not able to do the things I would normally do while being alive, in my own body so what is the point in being alive when you cannot even live your life to the fullest? Therefore, I wouldn’t trap myself in an infant’s mind.

    ReplyDelete