Wednesday, 5 April 2017

being John Malkovich,1999 (Leandro Diaz-Pappas, Brent Pereira, Steven Soldano)



Image result for being john malkovich
Being John Malkovich (1999)
Director: Spike Jonze
Screenwriter: Charlie Kaufman
Actors: John Cusack (Craig Schwartz), Cameron Diaz (Lotte Schwartz), John Malkovich (John Malkovich), Catherine Keener (Maxine Lund)
Running time: 1h 52min (IMDb)
Trailer:


Film Review:



   Craig Schwartz, played by John Cusack, is a puppeteer who is forced to find a job because he and his wife Lotte, played by Cameron Diaz, are struggling to make ends meet. Without many skills other than his puppeteering, Craig inquires about a job filing documents for a company because of his quick hands. When he gets to the building, he finds out that the job is located on the 7 ½ floor, a floor placed in between two others with a ceiling half the height of a normal one. While at work one day, Craig discovers a tiny door that had been hidden behind one of the filing cabinets. He enters inside to find a dark tunnel that leads directly to the brain of celebrity actor John Malkovich and after 15 minutes, shot him out on the side of the New Jersey Turnpike. He tells Lotte about it, who tries it for herself and while in the mind of John Malkovich, she discovers that she is really a transexual. Craig then tells Maxine, his co-worker that he is in love with, about the portal and together they begin to start charging people $200 to take their own turn inside the mind of Malkovich. While this is happening, Lotte begins to develop feelings for Maxine as well and over a short period of time Craig and Lotte both lust for her. Maxine rejects Craig but tells Lotte that she feels the same feelings for her but only when she is in the mind of John Malkovich. Craig becomes jealous of his wife and puts her in a cage while he goes back into the mind of John Malkovich to have sex with Maxine. He starts to get better and better at controlling Malkovich by spending more time inside his mind until he is able to take full control. Craig attempts to live his dream as a puppeteer through Malkovich and alongside Maxine but this dream takes some unexpected twists and turns at the end.

Image result for being john malkovich
( The secretary missundertanding every workd that Craig is saying )

Craig Schwartz is a complex character, right from the beginning of the movie he was already showing signs that he was a deeper thinker than just a regular 2-dimensional character.  One line that stood out that demonstrates Craig's kind of thinking was when he said “Consciousness is a terrible curse, I think, I feel, I suffer, all I ask in return in the opportunity to do my work.” Craig envies his puppets who lack consciousness but he later discovers that he can live his dream still with his own consciousness but through the body of John Malkovich as well as control him as he would one of his puppets.

Lotte Schwartz is weird and quirky character that the viewer doesn’t know much about at the start of the film other than the fact that she is married to Craig and she is an animal lover. She starts making more and more appearances in the film as it progresses resulting in the viewer learning more about her as well as her learning more about herself. Through the mind of John Malkovich, she learns that she is actually transsexual and questions more about her relationship and her everyday life.
       
  John Cusack did a very good job at portraying an awkward, almost unreadable character in Craig Schwartz. Even when he is angry, frustrated or happy he still maintains a weirdly calm and blank expression. Playing with puppets isn’t something that the common person does and John Cusack really turned himself into a typical “weirdo” for this role. Cameron Diaz played a role uncommon to the ones that she usually plays but just like her co-star John Cusack, she as well did a good job turning herself into a quirky, unusual, animal loving character that developed greatly throughout the course of the film.
   

   The lighting used during this movie was pretty consistent, with the majority of the movie being shot with low-key lighting. Many of the scenes were filmed at night with most of the lighting coming from the actors surroundings like streetlights and illuminated signs. Other scenes that used very low-key lighting is when characters would make their way through the tunnel leading to the mind of John Malkovich. This adds gloominess and gives an uneasier feel to these scenes. It might not be noticed how dark the actual story of the movie is until the viewer looks back at the film in its entirety after watching it but the darkness of the lighting does help to add to the overall darkness of the movie in the same way that might be done in a horror film. High-key lighting was used more for scenes that were shot inside the business building. Most of these scenes were less serious and the lighting gave them a more relaxed feel. Shadows were used to add a sort of creepiness to these scenes like when Craig would be doing his puppeteering, most of the room would be dark and lights focusing on the stage and his puppets creating shadows in the back.

Image result for being john malkovich
( Craig, Lotte and Maxine looking into John's portal to his mind)

One technique that was used to enhance the viewer's feeling of seeing through the eyes of John Malkovich was the use of a POV shot whenever a character was inside his mind. The viewer would see what John Malkovich was seeing and a black rim was added to the outside of the screen to give the viewer the impression that they really were inside the mind of this celebrity. Another interesting technique that was used was adding the dark, confusing introduction to the film of the lifelike puppet dancing around dramatically that had viewers questioning just what they were watching. This turned out to be a foreshadow of when Craig would finally make it as a puppeteer after he took over control of the body of John Malkovich.


Image result for being john malkovich
(The resulst of John going into his own portal to his mind)

Another interesting aspect of the film was the use of editing. Short, rapid takes were used in multiple scenes, one being when Lotte found the room in Dr. Lester’s house with the timeline of the life of John Malkovich showing all the pictures of him growing up. Using these types of takes added an overwhelming feeling to the scene and got a lot of information and substance across in a short period of time. Long takes that seemed to be unfolding in real time occurred during some dialogue that only one camera was used for. Doing this made the viewer feel as if they were actually watching in on their conversation rather than the feeling of just viewing it in a movie from multiple angles. Cross-cutting was also used when John Malkovich was on the phone with Maxine and then would cut to Lotte with a POV view inside his mind. This gave the viewer the ability to experience two different perspectives, that of being somebody in the room with John and experiencing him from the exterior and give the perspective of Lotte who was in his interior.

word count: 1187

Likes and Dislikes:



The main thing that we did like about the film was its' uniqueness and the fact that we’ve never seen a film even remotely similar to it. It was such an odd experience watching it. When Lotte says, “I think it's kinda sexy that John Malkovich has a portal, y'know, sort of like, it's like, like he has a vagina. It's sort of vaginal, y'know, like he has a, he has a penis AND a vagina. I mean, it's sort of like... Malkovich's... feminine side. I like that,”1 you just scream, “What?” Things like that are not things we get to see often enough in movies. Something that we didn’t like were some of the frustrating scenes that happened in the beginning of the film that did not really make sense to us but that we knew were intentional once the movie continue and saw just how absurd it was. An example of this was the scene when the secretary could not understand what Craig was saying even though he was speaking perfectly fine and then when Dr. Lester was also speaking fine, he said that he had a speech impediment and that it was a miracle that the secretary could even understand him. It was later proved that all these weird, frustrating scenes were placed in the film to add to its uniqueness and to give the viewer the same frustration that the characters in the film were feeling. Something that we did not necessarily not like but that we did not fully understand was the whole concept of the 7½ floor. At first we didn’t know what exactly it had to do with the rest of the story but at the same time while being completely out of place, it seemed to fit within this film because of all the other weird aspects that were included in it. It also would’ve been nice to give the movie a longer running time to leave room to explore how Maxine can control Craig. It’s obvious and she even says it herself, we just think it’s something very interesting that the film could have exploited more.



Image result for 4 on 5 picture stars


Course Connections:

           


Being John Malkovich is a complex movie that can easily cover all of the content of the course because of it's diverse and elaborate concepts and ideas. The three topics chosen for the course connection is the question of a material soul, the core or minimal self and the Matrix (1999).

     The first connection to this movie is the question of material soul. Material soul questions the mind and if the mind is material or if it’s not. The brain can be said to work independently from the body. This connects to Descartes’ dual substance problem, where everything is seen to be binary while they can actually be things to work in cohesion. These ideas mean that we could not need a physical brain to have a mind, a cognition. In the movie, Craig and other people are able to go into John’s mind while they still have their own consciousness and so does John. In this movie, it is possible to use your own mind to get inside someone else’s and at a certain point take control of their body. Maxine fell in love with Lotte when Lotte was inside John’s mind. This means that in some way Maxine was able to see or feel past the physical boundaries of John and into the mind that Lotte has taken over. This movie overall theorizes that everyone has a soul of their own and that the soul only works when attached to a brain. The movie is saying that the someone's soul is able to travel into someone's else’s mind and can even take control if their brain. Also, brains are transported to bodies here as if they work independently from one another.

    Also, the question of core or minimal self is brought up when Craig is talking to a chip. He is on the couch and watching the largest puppeteer show in the world which makes him feel bad about his own puppeteering. So he turns to the monkey and says “You don’t know how lucky you are being a monkey. Because consciousness is a terrible curse. I think, I feel, I suffer.” When Craig was talking to the monkey, he believed that it was a core or minimal self. That it can only function and behave due to internal animal instincts. But when Lotte would interact with the monkey, she talked to is as if it was aware and cognitively sophisticated, just like another part of the family. In the movie, Craig had assumed that the monkey was not a conscious being most probably because it couldn’t verbally speak or interact with him.  For Lotte, on the other hand, she believed that the monkey was, in fact,  because she interacted with it more and was able to sense it from the monkey’s interactions with her. There’s even the fact that the monkey has flashbacks of its childhood trauma when it saves Lotte from the cage due to empathy. It even goes through therapy, like a human would.  

     It’s hard to not associate, “Being John Malkovich,” with, “The Matrix.” Dr. Lester’s character is constantly mentioning his speech impediment and apologizing for how probably no one can understand a thing he’s saying. The thing is, the characters, as well as the viewer, can understand every word and don’t hear a speech impediment at all. Even the secretary, or at least who we thought was a secretary, can’t understand a single thing Craig is saying even though he is speaking completely clearly. So some people’s perceptions can be different to others. Maybe my reality is not the same as someone else’s or that my perception of the smell of apple pie is a completely different smell than someone else’s. Just like in, “The Matrix,” what is real? Is it how we feel, how we feel our reality is or how one may feel what the smell of apple pie is or is it the real world, the real world that is outside the matrix and the real smell of apple pie, if there is such a thing.




Questions:


1. If you could get everything you’ve ever wanted in life and leave the wretched one you currently have behind by taking control of somebody else’s body and removing their control of it, would you at least think about doing it?


2. Why do you think Lotte never got surgery to have a penis?

3. Do you think there’s any evidence in the movie that shows where Craig’s need to control stems from, besides puppeteering?




Works Cited:

Mo, M. (2007). The Philosophy of The Matrix. ScienceBlogs, Retrieved from http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2007/08/04/the-philosophy-of-the-matrix/.

Seth, A. (2016). The material soul. Spiked, Retrieved from http://www.spiked-online.com/spiked-review/article/the-material-soul/17970#.WOWJGTvyvIU

Being John Malkovich. Directed by Spike Jonze, performances by John Cusack, Cameron Diaz, John Malkovich, and Catherine Keener, Universal Studios/Focus Features, 1999.








The Blade Runner (1982) by: Kevin Sirgi, Mitchell Khury, and Juliano Malizia



The Blade Runner (1982)



General Information:
Release date: June 25th, 1982
Director: Ridley Scott
Screenwriter: Hampton Fancher, and David Webb Peoples
Lead Actors: Harrison Ford (as Rick Deckard), Rutger Hauer (as Roy Batty), Sean Young (as Rachael), and Daryl Hannah (as Pris)
Running time: 1h 57min
(Source: IMDb)


Film Review:

It’s the year 2019. Although the future has brought great technology, there is a darker side to the story as the advances in technology designed to help humans are also threatening them. A group of four replicants, highly advanced robots designed by humans in order to colonize other planets have turned rogue and are coming back to hearth with a vengeance. Replicants are designed to mimic humans in every physiological aspect while being physically superior. In response, Rick Deckard, a retired cop turned Blade Runner comes out of retirement to locate and “retire” the rogue replicants. In the process Deckard falls in love with a replicant who is capable of complex human emotions and behaviors that she didn’t even know she was a replicant. Deckard successfully retires three out of the four replicants. In the final scenes the last replicant is on the verge of killing Deckard. However, as the replicant reaches the end of his four year life span he decides to save Deckard.
This films cinematic techniques enhanced the viewers viewing experience. The director made great use of camera angles and techniques such as long shots and close-ups.
Close ups are used throughout the movie to emphasize character emotion and intensity. An example of this in the film would be when Deckard is performing the Voight Kampff and the camera shows a close up of Deckards face in order to make the viewer feel the intensity of the interrogation and to bring up the question “what is he thinking” when interrogating people and perhaps also whether or not he is a replicant himself.
Camera angles are used in an immense way during the last few scenes where Roy is chasing Deckard through the abandoned apartment buildings. Specifically, when Deckard climbs outside the building to try to escape Roy, the camera angle points downwards to show just how high up Deckard is on the ledge and to bring attention to if he makes one mistake he's dead. This is used to add a sense of stress of suspense to the scene and it also shows that Roy has the power to end Deckard’s life.
Long shots are used primarily to bring attention to the setting of the scene. Specifically, the director chooses to use long shots when showing the new futuristic city of Los Angeles. This is because by using a long shot, the idea that this futuristic LA is vast and overly developed. During the long shots the viewer can see the gigantic digital billboards as well as the flying cars. This simply gives the viewer an impression on what the city is like for the characters living in it and adds emotion or a better understanding of the story.
The film is set in the future in a high-tech city. Props like gigantic billboard and flying cars are used to depict this. The city seemed to also have an Asian décor, for example hanging lanterns. Other recurrent props throughout the film were smoking and drinking.
In addition, the scenes are very dark and it is always raining throughout the movie. This is done to symbolize a dark time in society and to demonstrate the negative environmental effects that our actions will produce.
Lastly, the director made great use of sound (diegetic and non-diegetic) in order to make scenes more intense. Non diegetic sound is used often. However, this technique is used the best during the scene where Roy chases Deckard. Here the director chooses to add suspenseful music, to add the stress that Deckard is experiencing when he is running away from Roy. As the scene progressed to its climax the music would intensify. Diegetic sounds are also used very well during fighting scenes in the movie. Specifically the scene where Leon and Deckard are fighting in the streets. Here, the sound of Leon’s fists hitting and smashing things (such as when he breaks open the steel pipe) is projected in order to allow for the viewer to understand how hard the replicants can hit.
This movie raises several questions. For one, with all the technological advances should human strive to achieve the creation of a sentient being? This movie depicts a dystopian looking futuristic society which raises the highly debated topic that in fact our technological advances will lead to our downfall as a society. Finally we believe that this movie raises the question of what makes us human. The replicants appear to be human in every way however, they're not human because they are man-made.


Review:

Although it was released over three decades ago, Blade Runner presents concerns we may currently have in regard to our future. By extrapolating these, it causes us to question some of our current practices and currents of thought. The first is that of where our society could possibly be headed. Emphasized in the film through the use of long shots, Blade Runner presents a world that is essentially completely consumed by a city. There is not a glimpse of nature during the film’s entirety. The world has depleted itself of natural resources to that extent that the film’s characters are attempting to colonize other planets. To further reinforce this idea, is the use of non-diegetic sound of advertisement which recurs throughout the film. At the beginning of multiple scenes we are presented with a view of the city while a short advertisement plays in the background. It is effective in strengthening the idea of consumerism and the affects it has and continues to have in this world of the future. The film is great in its way of presenting us with this idea subtlety, and it is one of it’s strengths. 

The film also causes the viewer to question the advancement of technology and our development as humans alongside it. It does so through the duality of the film’s main character Deckard. Considered to be the best blade runner ever, Deckard has had a successful career killing Replicants. He is so good, he is asked to come out of retirement and tasked with killing the most advanced form of Replicant to date. He hunts them down and “retires” them while simultaneously, and perhaps unintentionally, he falls in love with Rachael; a Replicant advanced to the point where she does not even know she is one. This duality, and seemingly contradictory and hypocritical, main character reflects the uncertainty, boundaries, and potential precariousness of humans’ relationship with technology. Moreover, adding another element to this is the film’s conclusion in which Deckard is saved by another Replicant, who nearing the end of his four-year life span, experiences a spur of empathy and catches Deckard from falling to his death. This creates an interesting juxtaposition as to the human qualities of these two characters. For the film’s entirety Deckard has been determined to kill robots but when he himself is facing of death, it is one that saves him. Roy (the Replicant) displays a very human quality in saving someone’s life which is ironic as Deckard was attempting to end his.  Deckard’s experiences expose the different sides to humans and their relationship with technology as it progresses itself to become increasingly human.


Criticisms for the film arise from that it can be confusing at parts. At first the concept of the Replicant can be complex and the film does not necessarily do a great job at clarifying this. It more or less throws the idea out without a real explanation as to what exactly a Replicant is. Also, for a film which is set in the future, its conclusion does not give a glimpse as to the results of the film’s events. It leaves the viewer with an uncertainty about its characters, the Replicants, and the fate of the world it depicts.


Course Connections:

1.                   One of the themes related to the The Blade Runner is the concept of the internal lives of non humans and more specifically of robots. The idea of the internal self of robots is centered around the question “what is it like to be like a robot?” which in turn is about the idea of what “me” means to a robot or if this is even too far fetched. In the film, it becomes obvious that these replicant robots care about themselves and wish to live longer as well as appear to have certain emotions. However, are these emotions simply a very intelligent response based on the robots programing or are these true conscious actions that have been processed by the robots “self” is the big question that truly cannot be answered. Instead, to be able to get closer to the answer of “what is it like to be like a robot?” we are able to make observations based on the external components of the internal self such as thoughts that have been shared, feelings that are conveyed, and actions that these robots have taken. In the film, we can analyse these things such as, for example, the replicants want to prolong their life and ensure their survival, so they go on a mission to find a way to possibly live forever - this suggests a certain level of self consciousness.
2.                   The Blade Runner explores robots in the light of the uncanny valley, a concept covered in class in the article about robots. The uncanny valley is the concept that the more “human-like” an object or robot has become, the more scary and intimidating it becomes to humans up until it passes a certain threshold where it starts to evoke certain emotions in humans to the point where it becomes almost human. The idea of the uncanny valley is prevalent through Deckard’s experiences as well as the plot-line of the film. In this world, the robots are like humans in almost every way except for that they cannot experience true emotions such as humans can. As the uncanny valley would suggest, the more like humans the robots are the stronger the human’s response to them will be. the uncanny valley is subliminally used in scenarios such as the intimate scenes when Rachel pays Deckard a visit at his apartment where Rachel is seen as so human like that the viewer is able to feel the "passion" of the scene as well as the scene where Roy is chasing Deckard through the abandoned building and has extreme strength, this removes the viewers sense that replicants are very human like forcing the replicants to return to the actually valley of the uncanny valley and hence adding suspense to the scene. Deckard develops a real attraction to the Replicant robot named Rachel which suggest that these replicates have passed all prior steps of the uncanny valley and become essentially “human”.
3.                   The film connects to class discussions about sentience and more specifically what it is to be a sentient being and what is considered sentient. Sentience is defined by Merriam Webster’s dictionary as the “feeling or sensation as distinguished from perception and thought”(Merriam-Webster’s) which essentially means that a sentient being is aware of its surrounding and is able to think about the matter and feel in a subjective way. The film shows many scenarios where these replicants appear to have sentience. They appear to be conscious and are aware of the fact that they’re going to die soon and want to live longer – this may hint that they are understanding of the concept of death. Additionally, Rachael cries when Deckard tells her that her memories are from Tyrell’s niece showing that she has some sort of emotions. Regardless of being man-made, these robots have many of the criteria of a sentient being.




Questions:
1- Although placed in a very fictional setting, do you think that human technology will advance far enough to reach what it is in the futuristic Los Angeles as presented in the film?

2- Seeing how complex and realistic replicants can be, could you fall in love with a sentient and conscious replicant? Why or why not?

3- Seeing as these replicants fight so hard to live longer and appear to be highly intelligent, what ethical problems could arise when these highly advanced and possibly self aware robots are “retired” or is there no problem at all?

Web Links:
This article explores the motifs of the film. It analyzes it chronologically and sheds light on different motifs as it does so. It also draws comparison from the film to real world examples.
Dyer, J. (2012, May 15). Blade Runner: Indepth Esotoric Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2017.
https://jaysanalysis.com/2012/05/15/blade-runner-indepth-esoteric-analysis/

The author begins by exploring the motif of eyes in Blade Runner. The article then discusses the differences between Replicant and man. Finally, it begs the interesting question as to whether Deckard is a replicant or not.
Themes, Symbols and Motifs in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner. (2012, December 3). Retrieved April 5, 2017.
https://joakimtimon.wordpress.com/2012/12/03/themes-symbols-and-motifs-in-ridley-scotts-blade-runner/

Work Cited:

1- Dyer, J. (2012, May 15). Blade Runner: Indepth Esotoric Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2017.

2- Themes, Symbols and Motifs in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner. (2012, December 3). Retrieved April 5, 2017.

3- "Sentience." Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 5 Apr. 2017.

4-  Blade Runner. Dir. Ridley Scott. Prod. Ridley Scott and Hampton Francher. By Hampton Francher and David Webb Peoples. Perf. Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, and Sean Young. Warner Bros., 1982. Online.

5-  IMDb. "Blade Runner (1982)." IMDb. IMDb.com, 5 Mar. 2002. Web. 14 Mar. 2017.

6- Dazed. "Everything We Know so Far about the Blade Runner Sequel." Dazed. Dazed, 30 Aug. 2016. Web. 05 Apr. 2017.

7- Wenz, John. "Meet the Man Who Might Direct the 'Blade Runner' Sequel." Popular Mechanics. Popular Mechanics, 27 Feb. 2015. Web. 05 Apr. 2017.